What do the terrorists want?
Posted by admin in Current Events on 07 31st, 2010| icon314 Comments »

While I don’t agree with giving in to terrorism I think this is an interesting question. Is there anything that the countries in the west could actually do to stop the current campaign of Islamic terrorism?
I’m not even aware of what their demands are – I think that the Islamic terrorists, if they want to achieve anything other than wholesale murder, need to get some public relations going. At the moment they’re just seen as murdering lunatics, who prey on ordinary families going on holiday etc. Is this what they want? Are their demands just not shown by the Western media?
Do they have any aim other than to kill innocent people?

I don’t have a clue if they are involved in her disapearence , but do any of you find it disgraceful that they have an online store and are selling things? Shouldnt the fund be paying for t shirts etc and given away for free, not to pay for all the McCann pr people and for their morgage. Is it not time this fund was closed down? What do they need more money for if all they can come up with is a few posters? AHHHH, I FEEL BETTER NOW

with a reputation at stake, and hoping to improve a country’s morale, u.s. media houses are filtering the facts out of iraq, what/who are we, the rest of the world to believe anymore?

the pope?and on another note did jon r. ramsey’s killer ever get apprehended?what in your opinion,is the chance that maddie will be found alive and well?

Now two CFR women this is to obvious do you not think the CFR will just continue to feed the Corporations/Military Ind-Complex and continue to take freedoms away from the average American under the banner of fighting “terror” while taking away American sovereignty in the way Bush Sr. described in his plan for a”New World Order”. The Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group,
Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones of BOTH parties use
corporate news to tell lies to your children. The
Fourth Branch of the govt (lame-stream media) have
spent a century spinning away from their crimes!

Teachers and Professors blind you to the true History
of America and how it was retold by the winners:
Rockefeller/JP
Morgan/Rothchilds/Dupont/Heinz…
(Google: federal reserve jekyll island, prescott
thyssen, ibm nazi) these evil puppet masters do the
bidding of their corporate paymasters who are so
afraid of the average American realizing they have
been stealing not only our FREEDOM
but our hope of
providing a better life not only for our children but
also for mankind as a whole. These are the real
terrorists that are trying to take away our freedom
and democracy! Ask your grandfather how hard work used
to be enough for anyone to live the American dream.
(Americans work longer hours and are more productive
yet wages do not increase to match the rapidly
increasing cost of food, energy, housing) Soon this
could become only a dream that will go from the
average American to the elites and their families
while the population is enslaved by the murdering
despicable thieves of liberty and the people’s money:

Michelle Obama Barack’s Wife – CFR
Hillary Clinton – CFR, Bilderberg
Bill Clinton – CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral, Bohemian
Grove
Dick Cheney – CFR, Bohemian Grove, PNAC
George W. Bush – Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones
George H.W. Bush – Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones
John Kerry – Skull & Bones, CFR
John Edwards – CFR

Ron Paul for President ‘08


Everytime Bill or Hillary say something stupid they try and turn it around and blame the media. Hillary sahing Johnson had to get it done without giving any credit to Rev King was plain dumb but it displayed her disrespect for blacks. Bill’s fairytale is another example of others makeing the mistakes instead of him. Denial has been the key word in their media relations. Will it ever stop??

Polls have shown that talking tough about Russia standing up to foreigners strikes a chord with millions of Russians who yearn for the Soviet Union’s once mighty superpower status. (Writing by David Cutler and Richard Balmforth, London Editorial Reference Unit) – (Reuters) – Russian President Vladimir Putin was named Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” for 2007 on Wednesday for bringing stability and renewed status to his country.

(Advertisement)
Putin, 55, whose party recently won a big victory in parliamentary elections, is riding high on an oil-fuelled economic boom and soaring popularity from a no-nonsense approach that has restored national pride with a big military build-up and verbal attacks on the West reminiscent of the Cold War.

Here are some key facts about Vladimir Putin:

* Putin was born in October 1952 in St. Petersburg, then called Leningrad. A former KGB spy in East Germany, he rose to head the KGB’s successor organization, FSB, before being chosen as prime minister by the late President Boris Yeltsin in August 1999.

* He took over as acting president when Yeltsin stepped down in December 1999. After a huge public relations campaign to build a profile for the relative unknown, he was elected president in March 2000.

* He has overseen a steady concentration of power within the Kremlin walls, sidelining the political opposition and imposing tight control on the media. This has caused his Western critics to question his democratic credentials.


how can a public relations officer change the image of its organization which has a mirror image contrary to current image?

Hello.

I need help in this homework and I don’t know what this article is about. Can you please tell me whats this article about?

If you dont want to read the article below, then go to this link:

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/mar2008/gb20080314_430126.htm

Oil for China, Guns for Darfur

A new report by a nongovernmental organization links Beijing’s access to Sudan’s oil with China’s sale of small arms used in the Darfur conflict

by Moira Herbst

China’s thirst for oil is causing bloodshed. So says New York-based nongovernmental organization Human Rights First, which on Mar. 13 released a report linking China’s rising imports of Sudanese oil with sales of Chinese small weapons to Khartoum, used to further the deadly conflict in the western region of Darfur. The report is part of a broader campaign called Made in China: Stop Arms Sales to Sudan, timed to coincide with the runup to the Beijing Olympics in August. “China’s huge appetite for oil from Sudan filled Khartoum’s coffers, enabling Sudan to buy Chinese arms,” says Betsy Apple, a Human Rights First program director and author of the report. “It’s a toxic oil-for-arms relationship.” Apple says the group is calling for China to halt arms sales to Sudan immediately.

At issue is the simultaneous growth of Sudanese oil exports to China and the proliferation of Chinese small weapons in Darfur. When it comes to oil consumption, China is second only to the U.S. and almost half of China’s oil needs come from imports. The Chinese rely on Sudan to supply a big part of that. Sudanese oil shipments to China increased 63% from 2003 to 2006 and soared 113% last year alone. In 2007, China purchased 40% of Sudan’s 25-million-ton annual output of oil, accounting for about 6% of all Chinese oil imports (BusinessWeek.com, 2/13/08). State-owned China National Petroleum (CNPC) is the single largest investor in Sudan through its 40% stake in Greater Nile Petroleum, based in Khartoum.

Beijing has also been investing heavily in improvements to Sudan’s infrastructure. For instance, the Chinese have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into roads, pipelines, and other infrastructure projects.
Protests Against Darfur Violence Grow

Critics of the Sudanese regime contend that Chinese money is also supporting the country’s military and its militia allies in Darfur. Human Rights First argues that, in return for access to oil fields to help motor its growing economy, China provides Sudan with Chinese weaponry such as assault rifles, heavy machine guns, and mortars. China not only is Sudan’s largest economic partner, but also its “military mentor, advising its army and giving it guns,” says the report. Citing U.N. and Sudanese government data, the report states that China sold $3 million in small arms to Khartoum in 2003; that number reached more than $55 million by 2006.

Beijing denies charges that it is exacerbating the problem, arguing that China was the first non-African nation to send peacekeepers to Darfur. (There are 140 Chinese there now with another 175 scheduled to join them soon.) “We just want to send signals to Sudan and the outside world that the Chinese people and their government are sympathetic with the people there in Darfur. China is showing solidarity to the Sudanese unity government in its efforts to help people in Darfur,” Liu Guijin, Beijing’s special representative for Darfur, said last month according to a report by Xinhua, the official Chinese news agency. China has given $11 million in humanitarian aid to the region, Xinhua reports, and is providing $90 million in loans for water projects there.

That hasn’t convinced Human Rights First, which joins a chorus of nongovernmental organizations using the upcoming Beijing Olympics as a rallying cry (BusinessWeek.com, 2/20/08) against the atrocities in Darfur, where 200,000 have died and 2.5 million have been displaced over the past five years. Save Darfur, a coalition of 180 organizations, asserts that China’s purchases of oil from Sudan support genocide. Save Darfur is calling on Olympic sponsors including McDonald’s (MCD), General Electric (GE), and Adidas (ADDDY) to speak publicly against the violence in Darfur in advance of the so-called Genocide Olympics. On Feb. 12 Darfur activists scored a public-relations victory when film director Steven Spielberg resigned as artistic director of the opening ceremonies.
Can Beijing Be Held Accountable?

It is hard to argue with calls to end the bloodshed in Darfur. But some experts say the idea of holding the Chinese government accountable for violence in Darfur may not be realistic. They say manufacturers in countries such as Russia and Belarus can easily replace any withdrawal of Chinese small-arms exports to Sudan. Alternatively, if China stops buying Sudanese oil, another country will take its place. “It doesn’t hurt to yell for an arms embargo, but you need to ask yourself what will make it effective,” says J. S
I just need help in what does the article mean. I don’t get the vocabulary and I need someone to at least interpret it in easier words.


why?